What Calvin Trillin learned from his college writing course

0 Comment

What Calvin Trillin learned from his college writing course

HARI SREENIVASAN: Now to another in our Brief
But Spectacular series, where we ask people to describe their passions. Tonight, we hear from journalist and novelist
Calvin Trillin. His book “Jackson, 1964: And Other Dispatches
from Fifty Years of Reporting on Race in America” became available in paperback last month. CALVIN TRILLIN, Author, “Jackson, 1964: And
Other Dispatches from Fifty Years of Reporting on Race in America”: I was sort of between
projects a little while ago, and I thought, this would be a good opportunity to re-catalogue
my collection of Civil War artifacts. But I don’t have a collection of Civil War
artifacts, or any other collections. This is time to put that harpsichord kit together. I don’t have a harpsichord kit. I don’t have a golf game to polish. So, I suppose it’s just writing or sitting
quietly in a dark room. For 15 years, I did a piece every three weeks
for “The New Yorker” that was about 3,000 words. “The New Yorker” didn’t require what newspaper
people sometimes call the nut graph, which is the paragraph that tells you why this story
is important. The billboard paragraph in some of my stories
would have to say something like, all over the country, disreputable people in small
towns are killing each other, something like that. I mean, I didn’t have one of those. So, I was only interested in whether it was
an interesting story. I didn’t know much about “The New Yorker”
when I was a kid. I had one cousin who took “The New Yorker,”
and she was considered rather strange. I definitely backed into journalism. I think most people of my era backed into
journalism because they didn’t want to go to law school or they were trying to write
a novel and couldn’t figure out how to do it. I knew I wasn’t going to do anything that
required manual dexterity or mathematics skills. I have always said that mathematics was my
worst subject. I was never able to persuade the teacher that
many of my answers were meant ironically. I took a writing course in college that had
those usual mottoes, like — like show, don’t tell and all that sort of thing. And one of them was, individualize by specific
detail. I thought that was the most useful one, particularly
in attempts at humor. Humor is sort of indefensible. If the woman in the second row doesn’t laugh,
it isn’t funny. That’s one reason there’s no way to sort of
try to imagine your audience when you’re writing. I think you could only satisfy yourself. My wife, Alice, who died in 2001 was the person
I showed rough drafts to, I think the only person. What all writers want to hear if they show
somebody something is, brilliant, don’t change a word, even if you know it’s sort of rough. Obviously, she wasn’t going to say that. When Alice died, I was going over the galleys
of a novel about parking in New York, a subject so silly that I think I would’ve hesitated
to submit the book to a publisher, if she hadn’t, somewhat to her surprise, liked it. When the novel was published, the dedication
said, “I wrote this for Alice. Actually, I wrote everything for Alice.” My name is Calvin Trillin, and this is my
Brief But Spectacular take on my life and writing. HARI SREENIVASAN: You can watch more Brief
But Spectacular videos online at

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *